On this page
Our view: Banjo's Excel loan belongs on an established business's shortlist when the funding needs a longer repayment period or more choice over payment dates. The entry point is fairly demanding: two years of trading and $500,000 annual turnover. We would compare the complete security and repayment proposal before giving much weight to the $2 million ceiling.
On a small screen, scroll the table sideways to see every column.
| What to check | Review finding |
|---|---|
| Product reviewed | Business Loan Excel |
| Advertised amount and term | $20,000–$2 million; 6–60 months |
| Published starting criteria | Two years trading; $500,000 annual turnover; Australian business and eligible applicant |
| Repayments | Weekly, fortnightly or monthly, subject to the offer |
| Main qualification | Security, guarantees and pricing depend on assessment |
Where Banjo earns a place on the shortlist
Banjo's strongest case is an established business that needs a defined amount of working capital and wants some choice over the repayment rhythm. A wholesaler paid monthly may value monthly repayments more than a promise of a very fast approval. The choice of weekly, fortnightly or monthly payments is therefore a meaningful feature, provided the actual offer gives the business the cycle it needs.
The entry requirements narrow the audience. Excel's two-year trading history and $500,000 annual-sales threshold make it a poor starting point for a new microbusiness. Those requirements can be a useful filter: an owner below either threshold can avoid preparing a full Excel application and investigate a product whose published criteria match the business.
We also prefer Banjo's range when the broker or lender explains why a particular product was selected. Excel, Flexi and Bridge address different patterns of cash use. A general claim that Banjo offers flexible finance is less helpful than a schedule showing what the business pays before, during and after its expected cash inflow.
Which Banjo product fits?
Excel is the relevant starting point for a planned purchase or working-capital requirement that can be repaid over an agreed term. The Express product page checked on 10 October 2026 advertises $20,000–$750,000 over 6–60 months, with two years in business and $500,000 annual sales as starting criteria. Excel reaches a higher $2 million headline. Express’s reduced-document approach may save preparation, but it does not promise approval or make the larger Excel limit available on the same application. Banjo also publishes Flexi and asset-finance options: compare their payment pattern with the seasonal shortfall or equipment purchase being funded.
For a wholesaler, the useful flexibility is choosing a repayment schedule that leaves enough cash for the next stock order. For a new business, the two-year trading threshold ends the comparison much earlier. There is little value in preparing a full Excel application before meeting that published starting point.
Repayment choice helps only if the term fits the purchase
Consider a hypothetical business borrowing $80,000 for stock that it expects to sell over four months. Spreading repayments over several years would reduce the regular instalment, but it could leave the business repaying last year's stock while borrowing again for the next season. The longer available term is useful for some investments; it is not automatically good value for a short stock cycle.
Conversely, a fitout expected to improve earnings over several years may be difficult to fund from a very short loan. The owner should compare the total finance cost with the time the project needs to begin earning. Banjo's available terms give room to make that comparison, although the approved term depends on assessment.
A basic cash-flow test makes the tradeoff visible. If a hypothetical offer required $96,000 of scheduled repayments over 24 months, equal monthly payments would be $4,000. That arithmetic does not establish an annual interest rate or a Banjo price. It identifies the cash commitment the project must support, before allowing for fees outside that assumed total.
The fixed cost needs a repayment schedule
Banjo describes an origination fee on each advance and a fixed fee or interest expense. Its Excel FAQ says that fixed expense accrues upfront and is allocated to scheduled repayments. Accrual and allocation describe different parts of the same calculation; neither should be presented as interest recalculated on a declining balance. Ask for the net amount deposited, every scheduled payment and the total cost in dollars. A simple annual rate applied to the original advance cannot be compared directly with an APR on a reducing balance.
Its Excel page describes early payout as remaining principal plus the relevant payment-period interest, with other amounts potentially payable under the agreement. Obtain a dated payout quote if refinancing is part of your plan.
The application is digital, but it is still a credit assessment
Banjo's Excel FAQ describes analysing bank transactions and checking directors' credit profiles. An online application should therefore not be read as a no-credit-check route. Have the correct business identifiers, director details and an explanation of unusual bank transactions ready before beginning.
For a business with several accounts, an isolated statement may not show the complete trading position. Prepare a clear account of customer receipts, transfers, existing loan payments and tax obligations. That is practical preparation, rather than a claim that Banjo requires an identical document pack in every case.
The page gives indicative application and funding times, with funds dependent on approval. We would not commit to an equipment settlement or supplier deadline solely on the fastest advertised timing. Missing verification, security conditions or an incomplete application can matter more than the time needed to fill in the first form.
Read the security condition behind the headline
The Excel page uses “unsecured” with qualifications and also says security is generally required. Guarantees and security over business assets may be relevant, particularly for larger exposures. This is a material point to settle before choosing Banjo: request the security schedule and the names of every guarantor, rather than relying on the product label.
Our main reservations
We would want the fixed-fee calculation and early-settlement treatment set out in dollars. Banjo explains that the fixed fee or interest expense accrues upfront, while its Excel FAQ describes paying remaining principal and a proportion of the current payment period's interest on early repayment. Those statements make the written payout calculation particularly important for a borrower expecting to settle after a large customer payment.
The security wording also deserves more care than the headline suggests. The possible combination of director guarantees, a general security deed and other security can have consequences beyond the account receiving the money. Compare the assets and obligations covered by the proposed documents with the size and purpose of the borrowing.
Default is a further distinction from simply paying an instalment a few days later. Banjo's FAQ describes default interest, recovery costs and potential changes to the cost of future payments. An owner whose cash flow is already persistently short should give those provisions greater weight than speed or convenience.
What to compare next
Put Banjo beside Prospa for a smaller term-loan requirement, or a Judo Bank proposal for more involved business funding. Give each the same amount, intended repayment period and security assumptions. Banjo earns its place if its schedule or product structure solves a problem the other offer leaves open; the size of its lending ceiling is not enough.
Our assessment of Banjo
We would consider Banjo Excel for a mature business with a defined project, a credible repayment source and enough turnover to meet the published entry conditions. Repayment-frequency choice and several distinct finance products are worthwhile strengths. The absence of one universally applicable public price makes a tailored schedule essential to judging value.
Banjo is less convincing where a business needs only an occasional small draw, cannot meet the entry criteria or expects the longest term to solve a continuing operating loss. For an eligible borrower, the next useful step is a written Excel proposal alongside one comparable term-loan offer, with the same net cash advance, payment dates, security and intended payout date.
Sources and review scope
The sources below support the product discussion and dated history. A historical announcement does not establish current pricing or availability. Where official pages disagree, the difference is identified in the review; the provider's written offer determines approval, costs and contractual obligations.
This is an editorial assessment of published information, not an account of a test application or personal borrowing experience. See about SMB Loan for information about the site.