On this page
| Measure | days |
|---|---|
| Manufacturing | 31.8 |
| Construction | 30.3 |
| Mining | 27.8 |
| Wholesale Trade | 27.0 |
| Transport Postal and Warehousing | 27.0 |
| Retail Trade | 26.0 |
| Professional Scientific and Technical Services | 25.8 |
| Health Care and Social Assistance | 24.7 |
| Information Media and Telecommunications | 23.9 |
| Agriculture Forestry and Fishing | 23.0 |
| Rental Hiring and Real Estate Services | 22.7 |
| Accommodation and Food Services | 22.3 |
| Electricity Gas Water and Waste Services | 21.6 |
| Administrative and Support Services | 20.3 |
| Arts and Recreation Services | 19.9 |
| Financial and Insurance Services | 14.5 |
| All selected reporting businesses | 25.0 |
Median payment measures differ by industry
Payment terms look harmless on a contract until wages, GST and suppliers fall due before the customer pays. The national median in our sample was 25 days, yet a supplier serving manufacturers or construction groups faced a typical average payment time above 30 days.
This index examines the latest standard report from 3,141 entities in the Payment Times Reports Register. It is a study of large customers and corporate groups that must report, not a survey of every Australian invoice.
Where suppliers waited longest
Manufacturing produced the longest median average payment time at 31.8 days, followed by construction at 30.3 days. Mining, wholesale trade and transport each sat near 27 days. Financial and insurance services were at the other end of the table, with a 14.5-day median.
The within-30-day measure tells a similar story. The median manufacturer paid 56.8 per cent of invoices inside 30 days, while construction reported 56.2 per cent. Financial services reported 93.5 per cent, and electricity, gas, water and waste services reported 88.5 per cent.
Speed and compliance are not identical. Construction’s median share paid within agreed terms was 76 per cent, stronger than several faster industries. A 45-day contract may be honoured exactly, while still leaving a small supplier carrying more working capital than a 14-day arrangement would require.
The financing cost hidden inside a slow invoice
At the May 2026 average rate for new small business loans, 7.26 per cent a year, financing a $50,000 invoice for 30 days costs about $298 before fees. The same exposure costs roughly $597 over 60 days and $895 over 90 days.
That calculation is deliberately simple. A line of credit may charge a different rate, an invoice finance facility may price each drawdown separately, and a business using its own cash still gives up the return or stock purchase that cash could have supported. The useful comparison is between the cost of waiting and the gross profit on the work.
Payment concentration matters too. Ten customers paying predictably on day 30 can be easier to finance than one large customer paying anywhere between day 20 and day 65. Businesses assessing a contract should therefore ask about both the stated term and the customer’s actual payment distribution.
How to read the index before accepting work
The register is most useful when the prospective customer is a reporting entity. Search its legal name, confirm the reporting period and compare its average payment time with the share paid after 60 days. A deteriorating tail can matter even when the average looks stable.
Suppliers can then price the working capital requirement into the quote, negotiate deposits or progress claims, or arrange an appropriate facility before delivery begins. None of those steps fixes poor payment behaviour, but they prevent a profitable sale from creating an avoidable cash shortage.
The national figures should not become a promise about an individual customer. They are medians across company reports, and the register states that some reports may be temporarily omitted while they are screened. Industry classification also reflects the reporting entity, which may differ from the work performed by its supplier.
Methodology
The original edition describes downloading the register published on 15 July 2026, retaining the latest standard report for each entity and limiting the sample to reporting periods ending from 30 June 2025. It states that industry figures use medians and exclude groups with fewer than 30 reporters. The retained CSV is an industry summary; without the original filing extract, this revision cannot independently reproduce the selection, deduplication or exclusions.
The cost examples use simple interest at 7.26 per cent and do not include fees or compounding. They illustrate the carrying cost of a receivable rather than quote a finance product.
Download the cleaned index dataSources and update note
- Payment Times Reports Register data, register updated 15 July 2026.
- Reserve Bank of Australia Statistical Table F 7, May 2026 observation.
SMB Loan plans to refresh this index after each substantial register update, while retaining dated files so changes remain auditable.
Sources, citation and reuse
Data period: The source periods shown with each table. The figures describe populations or model assumptions, not a recommendation for an individual borrower.
Download the data and source notes (CSV). Original downloads used by earlier editions have been retained where available. Keep each file’s observation period with any citation.
Cite: SMBLoan, “Australia’s Slow Payer Index: July 2026 snapshot”, revised 10 October 2026, /research/slow-payer-index. For source questions or a correction, contact hello@smbloan.com.au.
Original SMBLoan charts may be reproduced with attribution and a link. Government and other third-party data remain subject to the original source’s terms; this page does not grant rights over third-party material. Please keep the observation period and methodological limits with any excerpt.
Read the medians correctly
Each payment band share is a separate median across reporters. The reported 75.4%, 20% and 2.5% shares therefore do not add to 100%. A median firm in one band need not be the median firm in another. The published CSV contains the industry summary, not the 3,141 underlying filings; it cannot by itself reproduce record selection or deduplication.
The historical extract was not rerun in October. Its extraction period is kept visible and no claim is made that it reflects today’s register. The original filing-level extract is needed to fully reproduce this study. The official register provides current data separately.
A slow invoice can create a funding need before it becomes a bad debt. Use the working capital model to test a longer collection period and the invoice finance guide to compare advances, fees and recourse.